The End of Absence: Reclaiming What We’ve Lost in a World of Constant Connection, by Canadian journalist Michael Harris, falls into the latter category; it’s one of the quieter and more philosophical works examining our current lives with technology, and the gap between the time before and after the Internet. What’s in that gap, Harris argues, is absence: the quality of daydreams, the ability to be bored, the importance of discovery. What has replaced that gap: going to a restaurant, coffee shop, subway station, where literally every person is a zombie with a smartphone or a laptop, unaware of the world around them, clipped into the matrix. Every one of these people — and seriously, spend a weekend in Brooklyn without a smartphone at your side, and watch as everyone else communes with machines — could stand to read Harris’ work.
Funny enough, it’s a book that’s aimed, in its way, at a very specific cohort — the just-cresting 30-somethings who remember a time before the Internet and hyper-connectivity, a generation who got their first emails on AOL when they were in high school, who had the chance to play outside without everything modulated by screens. People who think that texting is kind of a weird form of communication. People who may, sometimes, have Luddite tendencies, and can make a good argument for why “watching” a Neutral Milk Hotel concert through your iPhone is fairly detrimental to what could be (and often is) a magical experience.
Harris is a smooth writer and a smart critic about what we’ve lost in today’s technology. He is at his best in a chapter called “Confession,” he neatly illustrates the rise of bullying and suicides through the Internet, looking at the case of Canadian teenager Amanda Todd, showing how our human trust in the machine, in robots like the 1960s M.I.T. experiment ELIZA as well as fictional examples like Frankenstein’s monster, leads to people broadcasting the minutia of their lives online. When we record ourselves this way, we open ourselves up to other people’s opinions, in order to give ourselves the possibility of living famous lives. Harris interviews Todd’s grieving mother, and learns about her experience with cyberbullying, concluding, “we each forget, every day, how much care we need to take when using our seemingly benign tools; they are so useful and so sharp.”
Harris is much stronger when he’s writing about our lack of absence, our complete slip down into embracing the ease of technology without realizing the consequences. After he shows us the brave new world we’re living in, he ventures into the realm of stunt journalism in order to illustrate our problems. He gives up the Internet/online access for a month, and his diary of the days shows an addict’s withdrawal, unable to pay attention and function. It is mostly a crank’s reportage, and not particularly enlightening about how to live holistically with the Internet. The book is more interested in philosophy and provocative observations, but it makes no prescriptions for how to live now, which feels like a missed opportunity. Harris admits as much, that he’s just here to question the orthodoxy of letting the Internet into our lives, but it leaves the reader saying, “Yes, correct, and now what?”
Most of these “the Internet is here: this is what it’s doing, and how do we deal with it” books have started to blend together in my mind. There’s a lot of truth in them — the authors are effective at showing how the Internet changes us, warning us like Cassandras — but the net effect can be exhausting, as I’m not sure whether these books are pushing change, creating difference, or just serving as part of somebody’s platform for a TED Talk. Harris’ book is better than most — and, again, it should be passed out in Brooklyn, seriously — but it still leaves me with something like absence, as a reader. I want to know how to live in this world as a person reckoning with the Internet, and so far, most of what I’ve received are warnings.